DevImprint.

Rankings → docuracy

docuracy

People rank #398 by AI-assisted commits detected in public repositories over the 30 days from 25 August 2026. Profile on GitHub.

54.7% of known repositories scanned · provisionalSnapshot How we measure →
Download JSON ↗Read as Markdown ↗Coverage ↗
Cite this statistic

DevImprint recorded 1,124 detectable AI-assisted commits for docuracy during 2026-08-25–2026-09-23 (UTC). Population: resolved person; rank within people. Source snapshot: 2026-09-23T07:20:45.940618+00:00 (c6504ab6956593e3e72dfa5aba0290f688ff7b887d3d92074eaf6db5505efc1c). 54.7% of known repositories scanned; provisional. Methodology: 2026-09-14. Page: https://devimprint.com/developers/docuracy/. Current data: https://devimprint.com/leaderboard.json

Data & coverage

Daily activity

2026-08-25 to 2026-09-23
AI-assisted commits per day over the 30-day window beginning 25 August 2026. Days are UTC as recorded in the commit. The final day may be incomplete at the snapshot timestamp.
Table view
Day (UTC)AI-assisted commits
25 August 20260
26 August 20263
27 August 2026106
28 August 2026161
29 August 20260
30 August 20264
31 August 202674
1 September 202641
2 September 2026100
3 September 2026149
4 September 202616
5 September 202687
6 September 202697
7 September 202679
8 September 202672
9 September 20265
10 September 202631
11 September 202622
12 September 202610
13 September 202612
14 September 202614
15 September 202641
16 September 20260
17 September 20260
18 September 20260
19 September 20260
20 September 20260
21 September 20260
22 September 20260
23 September 20260

Repositories containing these commits

These are repositories where matching commits were found. They are not necessarily owned by this account or listed on its GitHub profile.

RepositoryLast 30 daysAll time
WorldHistoricalGazetteer/indexing7331,317
WorldHistoricalGazetteer/website223781
WorldHistoricalGazetteer/workbench-demo-req2155155
ihr-digital/london-customs-accounts-1380-15601313

About this page

Counts come from commits published in public repositories that carry a detectable AI coding tool signature. They are not a measure of productivity, effort, or code quality. False positives and missed activity are possible; absence does not establish absence of AI use. Read the methodology, orask to be removed.

Snapshot c6504ab69565 · 275,124 identities ranked.