jsboige
People rank #10 by AI-assisted commits detected in public repositories over the 30 days from 25 August 2026. Profile on GitHub.
- AI-assisted commits, last 30 days5,226
- All time18,924since detection began
- Active days29 of 30busiest day: 345 commits
- Tools detected1
Cite this statistic
DevImprint recorded 5,226 detectable AI-assisted commits for jsboige during 2026-08-25–2026-09-23 (UTC). Population: resolved person; rank within people. Source snapshot: 2026-09-23T02:29:02.569852+00:00 (47979766c79819bf87837b58b1cbe1c45f06b4517e1897c119004dafa57bf230). 54.7% of known repositories scanned; provisional. Methodology: 2026-09-14. Page: https://devimprint.com/developers/jsboige/. Current data: https://devimprint.com/leaderboard.json
Daily activity
Table view
| Day (UTC) | AI-assisted commits |
|---|---|
| 25 August 2026 | 42 |
| 26 August 2026 | 59 |
| 27 August 2026 | 63 |
| 28 August 2026 | 171 |
| 29 August 2026 | 106 |
| 30 August 2026 | 85 |
| 31 August 2026 | 45 |
| 1 September 2026 | 100 |
| 2 September 2026 | 245 |
| 3 September 2026 | 228 |
| 4 September 2026 | 139 |
| 5 September 2026 | 161 |
| 6 September 2026 | 158 |
| 7 September 2026 | 136 |
| 8 September 2026 | 166 |
| 9 September 2026 | 258 |
| 10 September 2026 | 171 |
| 11 September 2026 | 198 |
| 12 September 2026 | 261 |
| 13 September 2026 | 315 |
| 14 September 2026 | 274 |
| 15 September 2026 | 263 |
| 16 September 2026 | 247 |
| 17 September 2026 | 221 |
| 18 September 2026 | 345 |
| 19 September 2026 | 259 |
| 20 September 2026 | 323 |
| 21 September 2026 | 167 |
| 22 September 2026 | 20 |
| 23 September 2026 | 0 |
Repositories containing these commits
| Repository | Last 30 days | All time |
|---|---|---|
| jsboige/CoursIA | 4,823 | 14,390 |
| ArgumentumGames/Argumentum | 277 | 1,028 |
| jsboige/jsboige-mcp-servers | 58 | 1,949 |
| jsboige/roo-extensions | 48 | 1,521 |
| jsboigeEpita/2025-Epita-Intelligence-Symbolique | 20 | 33 |
| MadAppGang/claudish | 0 | 3 |
About this page
Counts come from commits published in public repositories that carry a detectable AI coding tool signature. They are not a measure of productivity, effort, or code quality. False positives and missed activity are possible; absence does not establish absence of AI use. Read the methodology, orask to be removed.