kakao-harris-lee
People rank #53 by AI-assisted commits detected in public repositories over the 30 days from 25 August 2026. Profile on GitHub.
- AI-assisted commits, last 30 days2,520
- All time4,140since detection began
- Active days26 of 30busiest day: 214 commits
- Tools detected2
Cite this statistic
DevImprint recorded 2,520 detectable AI-assisted commits for kakao-harris-lee during 2026-08-25–2026-09-23 (UTC). Population: resolved person; rank within people. Source snapshot: 2026-09-23T04:53:06.380608+00:00 (cf362c063c13813ede37faa658aae45f1184e9326bb3ec8a2b5f9680c16c0b7f). 54.7% of known repositories scanned; provisional. Methodology: 2026-09-14. Page: https://devimprint.com/developers/kakao-harris-lee/. Current data: https://devimprint.com/leaderboard.json
Daily activity
Table view
| Day (UTC) | AI-assisted commits |
|---|---|
| 25 August 2026 | 29 |
| 26 August 2026 | 66 |
| 27 August 2026 | 139 |
| 28 August 2026 | 63 |
| 29 August 2026 | 151 |
| 30 August 2026 | 134 |
| 31 August 2026 | 27 |
| 1 September 2026 | 56 |
| 2 September 2026 | 171 |
| 3 September 2026 | 32 |
| 4 September 2026 | 161 |
| 5 September 2026 | 90 |
| 6 September 2026 | 139 |
| 7 September 2026 | 128 |
| 8 September 2026 | 155 |
| 9 September 2026 | 214 |
| 10 September 2026 | 122 |
| 11 September 2026 | 97 |
| 12 September 2026 | 67 |
| 13 September 2026 | 0 |
| 14 September 2026 | 0 |
| 15 September 2026 | 100 |
| 16 September 2026 | 96 |
| 17 September 2026 | 83 |
| 18 September 2026 | 127 |
| 19 September 2026 | 70 |
| 20 September 2026 | 1 |
| 21 September 2026 | 0 |
| 22 September 2026 | 2 |
| 23 September 2026 | 0 |
Repositories containing these commits
| Repository | Last 30 days | All time |
|---|---|---|
| kakao-harris-lee/bid-vector-v2 | 1,420 | 1,437 |
| kakao-harris-lee/kis_unified_sts | 807 | 1,870 |
| kakao-harris-lee/easy-doc | 293 | 833 |
About this page
Counts come from commits published in public repositories that carry a detectable AI coding tool signature. They are not a measure of productivity, effort, or code quality. False positives and missed activity are possible; absence does not establish absence of AI use. Read the methodology, orask to be removed.