kim-em
People rank #748 by AI-assisted commits detected in public repositories over the 30 days from 25 August 2026. Profile on GitHub.
- AI-assisted commits, last 30 days827
- All time16,126since detection began
- Active days27 of 30busiest day: 195 commits
- Tools detected2
Cite this statistic
DevImprint recorded 827 detectable AI-assisted commits for kim-em during 2026-08-25–2026-09-23 (UTC). Population: resolved person; rank within people. Source snapshot: 2026-09-23T09:35:18.512893+00:00 (a990a2b79b423e57ba2515ee9f369641b8dba29ac1509c8b7371baab856bd684). 54.7% of known repositories scanned; provisional. Methodology: 2026-09-14. Page: https://devimprint.com/developers/kim-em/. Current data: https://devimprint.com/leaderboard.json
Daily activity
Table view
| Day (UTC) | AI-assisted commits |
|---|---|
| 25 August 2026 | 9 |
| 26 August 2026 | 64 |
| 27 August 2026 | 27 |
| 28 August 2026 | 1 |
| 29 August 2026 | 0 |
| 30 August 2026 | 8 |
| 31 August 2026 | 5 |
| 1 September 2026 | 7 |
| 2 September 2026 | 61 |
| 3 September 2026 | 54 |
| 4 September 2026 | 3 |
| 5 September 2026 | 64 |
| 6 September 2026 | 31 |
| 7 September 2026 | 15 |
| 8 September 2026 | 17 |
| 9 September 2026 | 11 |
| 10 September 2026 | 36 |
| 11 September 2026 | 19 |
| 12 September 2026 | 10 |
| 13 September 2026 | 11 |
| 14 September 2026 | 195 |
| 15 September 2026 | 85 |
| 16 September 2026 | 11 |
| 17 September 2026 | 49 |
| 18 September 2026 | 13 |
| 19 September 2026 | 4 |
| 20 September 2026 | 16 |
| 21 September 2026 | 1 |
| 22 September 2026 | 0 |
| 23 September 2026 | 0 |
Repositories containing these commits
| Repository | Last 30 days | All time |
|---|---|---|
| TauCetiProject/TauCeti | 420 | 1,519 |
| kim-em/hex-dev | 182 | 2,941 |
| leanprover/lean4 | 29 | 601 |
| kim-em/TauCeti | 21 | 880 |
| kim-em/kim-em.github.io | 20 | 41 |
| kim-em/cslib | 14 | 52 |
| leanprover/lean4-pr-releases | 13 | 744 |
| kim-em/mathlib4 | 11 | 673 |
| leanprover-community/mathlib4 | 11 | 283 |
| CBirkbeck/TauCeti | 10 | 538 |
About this page
Counts come from commits published in public repositories that carry a detectable AI coding tool signature. They are not a measure of productivity, effort, or code quality. False positives and missed activity are possible; absence does not establish absence of AI use. Read the methodology, orask to be removed.