paul-hammant
People rank #486 by AI-assisted commits detected in public repositories over the 30 days from 25 August 2026. Profile on GitHub.
- AI-assisted commits, last 30 days1,034
- All time3,478since detection began
- Active days27 of 30busiest day: 186 commits
- Tools detected1
Cite this statistic
DevImprint recorded 1,034 detectable AI-assisted commits for paul-hammant during 2026-08-25–2026-09-23 (UTC). Population: resolved person; rank within people. Source snapshot: 2026-09-23T07:57:26.613768+00:00 (33a4a1f56736ff4a617939d9a721fbb972172d57ad9a336aa1cee715067c409f). 54.7% of known repositories scanned; provisional. Methodology: 2026-09-14. Page: https://devimprint.com/developers/paul-hammant/. Current data: https://devimprint.com/leaderboard.json
Daily activity
Table view
| Day (UTC) | AI-assisted commits |
|---|---|
| 25 August 2026 | 32 |
| 26 August 2026 | 53 |
| 27 August 2026 | 38 |
| 28 August 2026 | 10 |
| 29 August 2026 | 55 |
| 30 August 2026 | 186 |
| 31 August 2026 | 77 |
| 1 September 2026 | 72 |
| 2 September 2026 | 31 |
| 3 September 2026 | 24 |
| 4 September 2026 | 19 |
| 5 September 2026 | 59 |
| 6 September 2026 | 36 |
| 7 September 2026 | 5 |
| 8 September 2026 | 15 |
| 9 September 2026 | 3 |
| 10 September 2026 | 14 |
| 11 September 2026 | 16 |
| 12 September 2026 | 12 |
| 13 September 2026 | 23 |
| 14 September 2026 | 37 |
| 15 September 2026 | 34 |
| 16 September 2026 | 42 |
| 17 September 2026 | 54 |
| 18 September 2026 | 29 |
| 19 September 2026 | 38 |
| 20 September 2026 | 20 |
| 21 September 2026 | 0 |
| 22 September 2026 | 0 |
| 23 September 2026 | 0 |
Repositories containing these commits
| Repository | Last 30 days | All time |
|---|---|---|
| aether-lang-dev/selaenium | 410 | 410 |
| aether-lang-dev/aeb | 221 | 768 |
| aether-lang-dev/aether | 177 | 1,020 |
| paul-hammant/selaenium | 160 | 160 |
| aether-lang-dev/aether-ui | 53 | 967 |
| live-verify/live-verify | 13 | 153 |
About this page
Counts come from commits published in public repositories that carry a detectable AI coding tool signature. They are not a measure of productivity, effort, or code quality. False positives and missed activity are possible; absence does not establish absence of AI use. Read the methodology, orask to be removed.