stijn-dejongh
People rank #270 by AI-assisted commits detected in public repositories over the 30 days from 25 August 2026. Profile on GitHub.
- AI-assisted commits, last 30 days1,343
- All time5,535since detection began
- Active days23 of 30busiest day: 166 commits
- Tools detected2
Cite this statistic
DevImprint recorded 1,343 detectable AI-assisted commits for stijn-dejongh during 2026-08-25–2026-09-23 (UTC). Population: resolved person; rank within people. Source snapshot: 2026-09-23T06:27:10.357269+00:00 (085da5dbaed954aaa18c1ceea96edd1658b3e5b0902e92d2d04a0199bed80e87). 54.7% of known repositories scanned; provisional. Methodology: 2026-09-14. Page: https://devimprint.com/developers/stijn-dejongh/. Current data: https://devimprint.com/leaderboard.json
Daily activity
Table view
| Day (UTC) | AI-assisted commits |
|---|---|
| 25 August 2026 | 0 |
| 26 August 2026 | 32 |
| 27 August 2026 | 22 |
| 28 August 2026 | 106 |
| 29 August 2026 | 72 |
| 30 August 2026 | 26 |
| 31 August 2026 | 148 |
| 1 September 2026 | 136 |
| 2 September 2026 | 42 |
| 3 September 2026 | 166 |
| 4 September 2026 | 52 |
| 5 September 2026 | 144 |
| 6 September 2026 | 18 |
| 7 September 2026 | 55 |
| 8 September 2026 | 37 |
| 9 September 2026 | 0 |
| 10 September 2026 | 24 |
| 11 September 2026 | 7 |
| 12 September 2026 | 0 |
| 13 September 2026 | 0 |
| 14 September 2026 | 49 |
| 15 September 2026 | 41 |
| 16 September 2026 | 25 |
| 17 September 2026 | 24 |
| 18 September 2026 | 30 |
| 19 September 2026 | 47 |
| 20 September 2026 | 40 |
| 21 September 2026 | 0 |
| 22 September 2026 | 0 |
| 23 September 2026 | 0 |
Repositories containing these commits
| Repository | Last 30 days | All time |
|---|---|---|
| spec-kitty/spec-kitty | 860 | 2,934 |
| Priivacy-ai/spec-kitty | 483 | 2,557 |
| spec-kitty/spec-kitty-design | 0 | 42 |
| Priivacy-ai/spec-kitty-events | 0 | 2 |
About this page
Counts come from commits published in public repositories that carry a detectable AI coding tool signature. They are not a measure of productivity, effort, or code quality. False positives and missed activity are possible; absence does not establish absence of AI use. Read the methodology, orask to be removed.