t3dotgg
People rank #195 by AI-assisted commits detected in public repositories over the 30 days from 25 August 2026. Profile on GitHub.
- AI-assisted commits, last 30 days1,546
- All time9,746since detection began
- Active days24 of 30busiest day: 215 commits
- Tools detected2
Cite this statistic
DevImprint recorded 1,546 detectable AI-assisted commits for t3dotgg during 2026-08-25–2026-09-23 (UTC). Population: resolved person; rank within people. Source snapshot: 2026-09-23T06:27:10.357269+00:00 (085da5dbaed954aaa18c1ceea96edd1658b3e5b0902e92d2d04a0199bed80e87). 54.7% of known repositories scanned; provisional. Methodology: 2026-09-14. Page: https://devimprint.com/developers/t3dotgg/. Current data: https://devimprint.com/leaderboard.json
Daily activity
Table view
| Day (UTC) | AI-assisted commits |
|---|---|
| 25 August 2026 | 128 |
| 26 August 2026 | 207 |
| 27 August 2026 | 35 |
| 28 August 2026 | 66 |
| 29 August 2026 | 28 |
| 30 August 2026 | 28 |
| 31 August 2026 | 1 |
| 1 September 2026 | 5 |
| 2 September 2026 | 215 |
| 3 September 2026 | 120 |
| 4 September 2026 | 141 |
| 5 September 2026 | 44 |
| 6 September 2026 | 186 |
| 7 September 2026 | 99 |
| 8 September 2026 | 97 |
| 9 September 2026 | 21 |
| 10 September 2026 | 6 |
| 11 September 2026 | 3 |
| 12 September 2026 | 0 |
| 13 September 2026 | 10 |
| 14 September 2026 | 38 |
| 15 September 2026 | 20 |
| 16 September 2026 | 21 |
| 17 September 2026 | 3 |
| 18 September 2026 | 0 |
| 19 September 2026 | 24 |
| 20 September 2026 | 0 |
| 21 September 2026 | 0 |
| 22 September 2026 | 0 |
| 23 September 2026 | 0 |
Repositories containing these commits
| Repository | Last 30 days | All time |
|---|---|---|
| pingdotgg/t3code | 169 | 520 |
| SergeSerb2/t3-pretty | 75 | 197 |
| deathemperor/infinitus | 75 | 197 |
| gannonh/kata-code | 75 | 197 |
| johnnyelwailer/t3code | 75 | 197 |
| maria-rcks/t3libre | 74 | 226 |
| ben-vargas/ai-t3code | 74 | 196 |
| mercurian-labs/astrolabe | 74 | 196 |
| trycua/t3code | 72 | 414 |
| bahlo/t3code | 72 | 194 |
About this page
Counts come from commits published in public repositories that carry a detectable AI coding tool signature. They are not a measure of productivity, effort, or code quality. False positives and missed activity are possible; absence does not establish absence of AI use. Read the methodology, orask to be removed.