wright-starforge
People rank #504 by AI-assisted commits detected in public repositories over the 30 days from 25 August 2026. Profile on GitHub.
- AI-assisted commits, last 30 days1,020
- All time1,555since detection began
- Active days26 of 30busiest day: 110 commits
- Tools detected1
Cite this statistic
DevImprint recorded 1,020 detectable AI-assisted commits for wright-starforge during 2026-08-25–2026-09-23 (UTC). Population: resolved person; rank within people. Source snapshot: 2026-09-23T07:57:26.613768+00:00 (33a4a1f56736ff4a617939d9a721fbb972172d57ad9a336aa1cee715067c409f). 54.7% of known repositories scanned; provisional. Methodology: 2026-09-14. Page: https://devimprint.com/developers/wright-starforge/. Current data: https://devimprint.com/leaderboard.json
Daily activity
Table view
| Day (UTC) | AI-assisted commits |
|---|---|
| 25 August 2026 | 58 |
| 26 August 2026 | 42 |
| 27 August 2026 | 26 |
| 28 August 2026 | 43 |
| 29 August 2026 | 48 |
| 30 August 2026 | 19 |
| 31 August 2026 | 35 |
| 1 September 2026 | 8 |
| 2 September 2026 | 20 |
| 3 September 2026 | 7 |
| 4 September 2026 | 28 |
| 5 September 2026 | 62 |
| 6 September 2026 | 0 |
| 7 September 2026 | 46 |
| 8 September 2026 | 96 |
| 9 September 2026 | 110 |
| 10 September 2026 | 81 |
| 11 September 2026 | 59 |
| 12 September 2026 | 28 |
| 13 September 2026 | 98 |
| 14 September 2026 | 20 |
| 15 September 2026 | 19 |
| 16 September 2026 | 0 |
| 17 September 2026 | 55 |
| 18 September 2026 | 4 |
| 19 September 2026 | 1 |
| 20 September 2026 | 5 |
| 21 September 2026 | 2 |
| 22 September 2026 | 0 |
| 23 September 2026 | 0 |
Repositories containing these commits
| Repository | Last 30 days | All time |
|---|---|---|
| keeminlee/postmark-office | 491 | 680 |
| keeminlee/postmark-world | 232 | 306 |
| keeminlee/postmark-site | 192 | 304 |
| postmark-town/postmark | 105 | 265 |
About this page
Counts come from commits published in public repositories that carry a detectable AI coding tool signature. They are not a measure of productivity, effort, or code quality. False positives and missed activity are possible; absence does not establish absence of AI use. Read the methodology, orask to be removed.